- DTN Headline News
Dairy Suit Draws Attention
Friday, January 23, 2015 3:48PM CST

By Todd Neeley
DTN Staff Reporter

OMAHA (DTN) -- Manure from dairy operations could be deemed solid waste if it is not managed properly, a federal judge has ruled in a Washington state case that has drawn the attention of national agriculture groups.

A federal district court earlier this month issued a first-of-its-kind ruling finding that nitrate levels exceeding federal limits in drinking wells downstream from Washington state dairy operations are enough to trigger a violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, based on the dairies' alleged improper management of manure.

Questions remain as to whether the ruling will have a wider effect on how livestock operations manage manure across the country. A handful of agriculture interest groups pointed out in a December amicus brief filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, that the dairy and thousands like it across the country already are regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act.

Additionally, Cow Palace, LLC, in Granger, Wash., already was working with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to correct problems related to manure management and drinking water.

The court ruled manure from dairies owned by Cow Palace may be a hazardous waste according to RCRA standards, endangering nearby residents. RCRA gives EPA authority to control hazardous waste from generation through transportation, treatment, storage and disposal. Never before has a court ruled, however, that manure becomes a hazardous waste when it is managed improperly.

The lawsuit was the latest in a series of legal actions taken against the dairies by two Washington, D.C.-based non-profit groups -- Community Association for Restoration of the Environment, Inc., and Center for Food Safety, Inc.

Charlie Tebbutt, an attorney representing the plaintiffs in the case, told DTN he believes the court's ruling sets legal precedent on a number of fronts. An attorney for a national farm group told DTN on background the industry is watching the lawsuit closely, but declined to comment on the record because the evidence in the case remains sealed by the court ahead of a possible trial.

"As for its precedent-setting value, among other things, the court found that lagoons, even if built to NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) guidelines, cause substantial leakage of manure," Tebbutt said. "This decision is the first of its kind in the country that finds that manure from industrial dairies, when mishandled as it is at Cow Palace, is a solid waste that is causing an immediate threat to human health.

"This facility is no different from the thousands of other animal factories across the country that are causing the same harms to the people around them. It is long past time for local, state and federal health protectors to take up the mantle and protect human health over corporate profits."

DTN's attempts to reach attorneys for the defendants were unsuccessful.


Other lawsuits have unsuccessfully attempted to convince courts to deem mismanaged manure as a solid waste; the courts declined because dairies and other livestock operations already are regulated.

There is concern in the agriculture industry that if a higher court was to at some point side with the Washington court, dairies and other livestock operations across the country could face manure management restrictions that would be unmanageable.

The court in this case issued a scathing indictment of the way lagoons are designed across the country. Lagoons generally are designed to have at least some level of permeability -- meaning all lagoons have at least some leakage not necessarily considered to be dangerous to public water supplies. In the case of Cow Palace, the court said in its ruling that the plaintiffs offered evidence of nitrate soil contamination up to 47 feet below ground near lagoons, "evidencing horizontal seepage between the lagoons."

"...Here, the manure leaking from defendants' lagoons is not a natural, expected consequence of the manure's use or intended use but rather a consequence of the poorly designed temporary storage features of the lagoons," the court wrote in its opinion.

"The consequence of such permeable storage techniques, thus, converts what would otherwise be a beneficial product (the stored manure) into a solid waste (the discarded, leaching constituents of manure) under RCRA because the manure is knowingly abandoned to the underlying soil. Save for one lagoon, defendants possess limited documentation to evidence that lagoons were actually constructed to meet NRCS standards.

"However, even assuming the lagoons were constructed pursuant to NRCS standards, these standards specifically allow for permeability and, thus, the lagoons are designed to leak."


An amicus brief filed with the Washington court in December on behalf of the dairy by National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Farm Bureau Federation, Washington Cattlemen's Association and the Washington Cattle Feeders Association, stated that the case should have been dismissed based on an "anti-duplication provision" of the RCRA statute because the Washington dairy already is regulated by other federal statutes.

The Washington court, however, cited a Ninth Circuit of Appeals opinion that there could be circumstances in which a material accumulates in the environment long enough after it serves its intended purposes, meeting RCRA's definition of solid waste.

The Washington court said the plaintiffs in this case showed Cow Palace had been applying manure in crop fields at rates beyond what could benefit plants -- meaning the manure would fit the definition of a solid waste. In addition, the court points to the storage of manure in composting bins as a problem.

"Here, this court finds that the manure in the unlined composting area is both knowingly abandoned and accumulating in dangerous quantities and thus a solid waste," the court said. "...The consequence of such unlined composting surfaces converts what would otherwise be a beneficial product (the composted manure) into a solid waste (the discarded, leaching constituents of manure) under RCRA because the manure is knowingly abandoned to the underlying soil.

"...In conclusion, this court finds no genuine issue of material fact that defendants' application, storage and management of manure at Cow Palace dairy violated RCRA's substantial and imminent endangerment and open dumping provisions and that all defendants are responsible parties under RCRA. This court reserves remedial issues, as well as the other remaining issues as discussed above, for trial."

In March 2013, EPA reached an agreement with Cow Palace and several other dairies in the region now operated by Cow Palace, to reduce nitrate levels in groundwater. According to an EPA news release, the dairies agreed to provide alternate drinking water sources for neighbors within a mile radius whose wells were found to have nitrate levels above EPA's drinking water standard of 10 parts per million.

In addition, the dairies agreed to take steps to control nitrogen sources such as manure and commercial fertilizer used at their facilities, and to conduct soil and groundwater testing at each dairy to determine whether nitrogen sources were being controlled.

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow Todd on Twitter @toddneeleyDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik
Markets Editor
Monday, January 26, 2015 5:18PM CST
Monday, January 19, 2015 6:16PM CST
Monday, January 12, 2015 6:00PM CST
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Monday, January 26, 2015 12:05PM CST
Sunday, January 25, 2015 11:05AM CST
Saturday, January 24, 2015 2:37PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:32PM CST
Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:47PM CST
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 3:29PM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Monday, January 26, 2015 3:56PM CST
Friday, January 23, 2015 1:36PM CST
Sunday, January 18, 2015 3:47PM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Friday, January 23, 2015 5:07PM CST
Wednesday, January 21, 2015 10:56PM CST
Friday, January 16, 2015 11:25PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Monday, January 26, 2015 8:51PM CST
Friday, January 23, 2015 8:55PM CST
Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:50PM CST
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 6:36PM CST
Monday, January 26, 2015 9:20PM CST
Monday, January 26, 2015 7:51PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:19PM CST
Tuesday, December 30, 2014 9:21PM CST
Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:45PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Monday, January 26, 2015 6:46PM CST
Monday, January 19, 2015 11:39PM CST
Friday, December 19, 2014 10:49PM CST
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Monday, January 26, 2015 8:35PM CST
Friday, January 23, 2015 8:06PM CST
Thursday, January 22, 2015 7:00PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Monday, January 26, 2015 1:14AM CST
Monday, January 19, 2015 9:18PM CST
Monday, January 12, 2015 3:00PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 5:16PM CST
Tuesday, January 20, 2015 11:34PM CST
Thursday, January 15, 2015 10:28PM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:19PM CST
Monday, January 26, 2015 11:03PM CST
Friday, January 23, 2015 8:46PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Tuesday, January 6, 2015 4:51PM CST
Thursday, December 4, 2014 6:34PM CST
Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:09PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN