- DTN Headline News
Farm Bill Future
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 3:35PM CST

By Todd Neeley
DTN Staff Reporter

OMAHA (DTN) -- The coming of a new presidential administration, particularly one expected to stand the status quo on its head as is the Trump administration, has many groups pondering what change might be coming to their corner of the world.

Ag policy and farm bill creators are no exception. Speakers representing think tanks, environmental and agriculture groups on a Farm Foundation panel in Washington, D.C., Wednesday, seemed to agree new political and economic realities will dictate where farm policy goes.

Chuck Conner, president and chief executive officer of the National Council of Farmer Cooperatives, told the panel's audience that rural America's voice in the presidential election showed how much influence those voters can have and likely will wield on members of Congress.

"Farmers and ranchers feel like they have been under attack," Conner said.

Though environmental interests including the Environmental Working Group and think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation are pushing to play a bigger role in shaping conservation provisions and in reforming current farm programs, Conner said they may take a back seat in the new administration.

"I don't expect other groups to have a big impact on the farm bill because of grassroots involvement," said Conner, who also will be a featured speaker at DTN's Ag Summit next week in Chicago.

Scott Faber, vice president of government affairs for the Environmental Working Group, touted his group's efforts to develop an online database outlining how federal dollars have been spent on conservation.

That database, he said, shows taxpayers haven't seen enough bang for the buck spent on those programs. The next farm bill, Faber said, should include at least a 15% increase in spending on the conservation title.

The next farm bill should fashion farm policy that includes a safety net, increases innovation and opens new markets to meet the expectations of consumers, he said. All the while, Faber said expanding conservation is needed to reduce farm pollution and protect drinking water.

"We must reform programs to treat ordinary consumers as the customer," Faber said, "by rewarding best practices in the right places. Too many dollars flow to projects that turn out few environmental benefits.

"No matter how great programs are, voluntary measures alone cannot meet environmental challenges from farm pollution. That's a hard truth we know because we've run the experiment. Our drinking water remains polluted."

While Faber said the EWG supports the need for a safety net to help farmers in "their time of need," EWG and the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation stand on the side of reforming subsidy and crop insurance programs.

Both groups question the need for revenue insurance programs including those for shallow revenue losses.

In addition, both organizations have pushed for separating the farm programs from nutrition programs. The thought is doing so would encourage Congress to make reforms to farm programs.

However, an attempt to separate the two died in the lead up to the passage of the 2014 farm bill. Conner said he believes they will stay together as part of the next farm bill, though he questioned the wisdom of talking about particulars at this early stage in the game.


Daren Bakst, agricultural research policy fellow at Heritage, said in addition to reforming farm programs there is a need for the next Congress to address regulatory reform.

"The federal government's intervention in agriculture is too extensive," he said. "Farmers need to be freed up."

The regulatory burden, in particular from the waters of the United States, or WOTUS, rule, now tied up in federal court is likely to be killed by the Trump administration.

Regardless of WOTUS's fate, Bakst said the next Congress will need to take action to improve the Clean Water Act. There continues to be ongoing debate about what are navigable waters, in particular.

"There is a need for Congress to define navigable waters," Bakst said. "The EPA and the Corps of Engineers have a broad interpretation."

In addition, Bakst said reform is needed to the Endangered Species Act to spread the costs and burden of preserving habitats across society instead of primarily on farmers and ranchers. In general, he said any regulatory reform efforts should focus on allowing local government entities to have primary authority.

"We can have reform and still have clean water," Bakst said. "The federal government is not a magical expert on environmental policy."

Panel speakers also discussed the ongoing issue of GMO labeling. Bakst said the next farm bill should provide direction on how to label foods, including needed "context" on the state of GMO science. So far, science has found little or no evidence that GMOs are harmful to human health or the environment.

"If we keep moving down this path there is not a way to turn back," he said.

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow me on Twitter @toddneeleyDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Monday, December 5, 2016 11:28AM CST
Monday, November 28, 2016 11:01AM CST
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:18AM CST
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:24AM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:08AM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 5:06AM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, December 1, 2016 10:13AM CST
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:08AM CST
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 10:09AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Friday, December 2, 2016 1:51PM CST
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:47AM CST
Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:04PM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Friday, December 2, 2016 3:36PM CST
Tuesday, November 8, 2016 9:38AM CST
Thursday, November 3, 2016 3:13PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Thursday, December 1, 2016 2:10PM CST
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 2:11PM CST
Monday, November 21, 2016 10:07AM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 3:56PM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 1:21PM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 9:00AM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, November 4, 2016 10:59AM CST
Friday, October 14, 2016 3:27PM CST
Tuesday, October 11, 2016 1:43PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Friday, December 2, 2016 3:33PM CST
Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:10PM CST
Monday, November 21, 2016 11:21AM CST
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Monday, November 14, 2016 3:53PM CST
Monday, November 7, 2016 1:16PM CST
Friday, October 28, 2016 1:57PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Thursday, December 1, 2016 11:05AM CST
Monday, November 21, 2016 6:18PM CST
Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:44AM CST
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:20PM CST
Monday, November 21, 2016 12:21PM CST
Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:06PM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, December 2, 2016 2:18PM CST
Thursday, December 1, 2016 4:18PM CST
Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:06PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Monday, November 21, 2016 4:29PM CST
Tuesday, November 8, 2016 9:46AM CST
Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN